CATEGORII DOCUMENTE |

Demografie | Ecologie mediu | Geologie | Hidrologie | Meteorologie |

+ Font mai mare | - Font mai mic

**GEODETIC INTERPRETATION OF
FREE NETWORK ADJUSTMENT**

**Rezumat:** Datumul initial este foarte important in
problemele geodezice, deoarece el ofera informatii esentiale in legatura cu
pozitia absoluta, orientarea si scara retelei luate in studiu sau a sistemului
de coordonate in care sunt definite punctele care alcatuiesc reteaua geodezica.
Avand in vedere aceste aspecte, putem defini *reteaua libera* ca fiind
reteaua in care nici un punct, orientare sau distanta nu este fixa, iar
coordonatele punctelor retelei, orientarile si lungimile laturilor sunt
compensate cu diferite valori. Pozitia, orientarea si scara unei retele libere
sunt fixate prin mentinerea centrului geometric al retelei si a sumei
patratelor distantelor radiale constante, iar rotatia intregii retele egala cu
zero.

1. Introduction

Most traditional geodetic observations (e.g. height difference, directions, angles, distances) do not describe the absolute position of points, rather the relative geometrical relation among different points within the network. Necessary initial data are the minimum number of reference data needed to define the absolute position of the network with the respect to some specified reference system.

In surveying or geodetic problems, the unknown parameters in adjustment by elements are often chosen as the coordinates of network points. Networks, which lack sufficient initial datum parameters, are called free networks. A completely free network may freely translate, rotate and change.

The general model for a completely free network

_{}

where L denotes the reduced observations, ε is
residual of each measurement, _{} are the unknown parameters (corrections to the
unknown coordinates of network points) and A denotes the design matrix of the
observation equations and will be singular, because

_{}

The rank defect of A:

_{}

is actually the same as the datum defect of the free network.

Under the least squares principle:

_{}

the coefficient matrix of the normal equation (_{})
will be singular for any positive matrix of weight matrix P. Consequently, the
solution (_{})
of normal system equation is not be unique [Fan, 2003] and that why furthermore
we should apply for these solutions the minimum-norm condition

_{}

where Q is a given symmetrical positive definite matrix.
This unique solution _{} which satisfies both eq. (4) and (5) is called
the minimum-norm least-squares solution. For Q = I, _{} can be written as [Fan, 2004]:

_{}

where _{}has
dimension _{} and is defined:

_{}

It has been proved that the
derived minimum-norm least-squares solution _{} also satisfies:

_{}

2. Structure of d-matrix

From the defining equations (7), one can see that matrix D must be dependent on the structure of the design matrix A (the configuration of the network). This gives us the possibility to find out the elements of D for different types of free networks, where the coordinates of all unknown points are treated as unknown parameters in the observation equations.

The four initial data in a second dimensional free
network correspond to a 2D planar transformation. Based on this, let (_{})
denote the coordinates corrections to the approximate coordinates (_{})
of point *i* (_{})
and _{} is the number of the unknown points. The
minimum norm condition when Q=I becomes:

_{}

The adjusted coordinates of point *i*
after the network adjustment can be written

_{}

On the other hand eq 10) can be
seen also as a planar transformation of the approximate coordinates (_{})
with two translation parameters (_{}),
small rotation angle (a) and a small scale change (s):

_{}

from where the correction equations becomes:

_{}

or explicitly:

_{}

where the second-order terms _{} has been omitted.

In this condition eq. (9) becomes a function of four
variables (_{}).
The minimum of this function can be achieved when the derivatives of F with
respect to each of the four parameters are zero in the same time:

_{}

Neglecting constants +2 and -2 before the summation signs in the above four equations

_{}

and rewriting all equations in matrix notations will lead finally to:

_{}

By comparison the eq 16) and eq.(8), the form of D-matrix for 2D free networks with no initial datum (d=4) looks like:

_{}

Similarly one can analyse the observation equations of the other types of free networks:

Ø Levelling networks (d=1);

Ø 2D triangulation networks with distance measurements (d=3);

Ø 2D triangulation networks with direction measurements (d=4);

Ø 3D free network without distance measurements (d=7).

3. Interpretation of d-matrix

Free network has insufficient reference datum. Therefore
the uniquely defined minimum-norm least-squares solution given in eq 6) implies that a reference datum has somehow been
establish mathematically. By looking at the form of matrix D from eq 17), one may find out the geodetic implications of _{}.

Assume that point P_{i} (see figure 1) has
approximate coordinates (_{})
before the adjustment and adjusted coordinates (_{})
after the adjustment process which are linked each other by eq 10).

In the same time let compute the distances from the
coordinate center of the coordinate system O(0,0) to
point _{} (before the adjustment) and _{}(after
the adjustment)

_{}

and the corresponding azimuth of the two radial vectors _{} and _{}are:

_{}

Figure 1: Reference datum in free network adjustment

Let now to insert the corrections from eq 10) in the first two relations of eq.(14):

_{}

and then dividing by k (number of points), we will obtain that the arithmetic mean of the coordinates after adjustment and before adjustment remains constant:

_{}

The last equation expresses nothing else that the geometrical center of the triangulation network remains fixed in free networks adjustment, in this way the absolute location of the network is implicitly established.

Now let start from eq. (19) where the adjusted coordinates are replaced using the same eq 10):

_{}

and making an extension in _{})

_{}

The area _{}swept
by vector _{}during
the rotation between the two stages of free network adjustment with angle _{}is:

_{}

Make a summation for all network points, the total area A becomes:

_{}

which reveals that the whole geodetic network has zero rotation during free network adjustment, although each individual radial vector from the origin to each point of the network may have undertaken a small rotation.

For the last relation given in eq 10), we consider the squared radial distances [see eq.(18)]:

_{}

Neglecting the second degree terms of the corrections:

_{}

Taking into account last row from eq 14)

_{}

which implies that the sum of all squared radial distances remains fixed in free network adjustment and the scale of the network is then defined.

4. Conclusions

From mathematical point of view, free network adjustment solution is perfectly demonstrated, using the minimum-norm least-squares inverse. Even in the networks with lacks sufficient reference datum the minimum-norm least-squares solution solves this problem somehow, but from geodetic point of view this is questionable because all four parameters (the origin of coordinate system, the orientation and the scale) are created artificially.

Free networks as trilateration networks or triangulation networks with some distance measurements do not lack scale datum, so the problem is reduced to establish the position and the orientation based on the first two upper conclusions.

The three dimensional free network can be viewed as the general case which includes even the 1D leveling networks as well as the 2D triangulation or/and trilateration networks. Photogrammetric bundle adjustment with relative orientation and without absolute orientation is one example where completely free 3D networks are involved [Papo, 1982].

5. References

[1] **Andrei C.O.,** *Analysis of geodetic networks
using simulated observations*. 2005, Department of Geodesy, Royal Institute
of Technology,

[2] **Bjerhammar A.,** *Theory of errors and
Generalized Matrix Inverses*. 1973, Elsevier,

[3] **Fan H.,** *Theory of errors and Least Squares
Adjustment*. 2003, TRITA GEOD No. 2015, Department of Geodesy, Royal
Institute of Technology, Stockholm, Sweden.

[4] **Sjberg, L.E.,** *Lecture Notes on General
Matrix Calculus, Adjustment and Variance-Covariance Component Estimation*.
1984, Nordiska forskarkurser "Optimization of Geodetic Operations". Norges
Geogr.Oppm. Publ. 3/1984.

[5] **Papo H.B., Perelmuter A**., *Free Net Analysis
in Close-Range Photogrammetry*. 1982, Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote
Sensing, vol.48, No.4, pp.571-576.

Politica de confidentialitate | Termeni si conditii de utilizare |

Vizualizari: 2713

Importanta:

Termeni si conditii de utilizare | Contact

© SCRIGROUP 2024 . All rights reserved