TERMENI importanti pentru acest document
Exposure is a measure of the sensitivity of the value of a financial
item (asset, liability or cash flow) to changes in the relevant risk factor
while risk is a measure of
variability of the value of the item attributable to the risk factor. Let us
understand this distinction clearly. April 1993 to about July 1995 the exchange
rate between rupee and US dollar was almost rock steady. Consider a firm whose
business involved both exports to and imports from the
Hedging means a transaction undertaken specifically to offset some exposure arising out of the firm’s usual operations. In other words, a transaction that reduces the price risk of an underlying security or commodity position by making the appropriate offsetting derivative transaction.
In hedging a firm tries to reduce the uncertainty of cash flows arising out of the exchange rate fluctuations. With the help of this a firm makes its cash flows certain by using the derivative markets.
Speculation means a deliberate creation of a position for the express purpose of generating a profit from fluctuation in that particular market, accepting the added risk. A decision not to hedge an exposure arising out of operations is also equivalent to speculation.
Opposite to hedging, in speculation a firm does not take two opposite positions in the any of the markets. They keep their positions open.
5. Call Option:
A call option gives the buyer the right, but not the obligation, to buy the underlying instrument. Selling a call means that you have sold the right, but not the obligation, to someone to buy something from you.
6. Put Option:
A put option gives the buyer the right, but not the obligation, to sell the underlying instrument. Selling a put means that you have sold the right, but not the obligation, to someone to sell something to you.
7. Strike Price:
The predetermined price upon which the buyer and the seller of an option have agreed is the strike price, also called the ‘exercise price’ or the striking price. Each option on an underlying instrument shall have multiple strike prices.
8. Currency Swaps:
In a currency swap, the two payment streams being exchanged are denominated in two different currencies. Usually, an exchange of principal amount at the beginning and a re-exchange at termination are also a feature of a currency swap.
A typical fixed-to-fixed currency swaps work as follows. One party raises a fixed rate liability in currency X say US dollars while the other raises fixed rate funding in currency Y say DEM. The principal amounts are equivalent at the current market rate of exchange. At the initiation of the swap contract, the principal amounts are exchanged with the first party getting DEM and the second party getting dollars. Subsequently, the first party makes periodic DEM payments to the second, computed as interest at a fixed rate on the DEM principal while it receives from the second party payment in dollars again computed as interest on the dollar principal. At maturity, the dollar and DEM principals are re-exchanged.
A floating-to-floating currency swap will have both payments at floating rate but in different currencies. Contracts without the exchange and re-exchange do exist. In most cases, an intermediary- a swap bank- structures the deal and routes the payments from one party to another.
A fixed-to-floating currency swap is a combination of a fixed-to-fixed currency swaps and a fixed-to-floating interest rate swap. Here, one payment stream is at a fixed rate in currency X while the other is at a floating rate in currency Y.
Futures are exchanged traded contracts to sell or buy financial instruments or physical commodities for future delivery at an agreed price. There is an agreement to buy or sell a specified quantity of financial instrument/commodity in a designated future month at a price agreed upon by the buyer and seller. The contracts have certain standardized specification.
10. Transaction Exposure
This is a measure of the sensitivity of the home currency value of the assets and liabilities, which are denominated, in the foreign currency, to unanticipated changes in the exchange rates, when the assets or liabilities are liquidated. The foreign currency values of these items are contractually fixed, i.e.; do not vary with exchange rate. It is also known as contractual exposure.
Some typical situations, which give rise to transactions exposure, are:
(a) A currency has to be converted in order to make or receive payment for goods and services;
(b) A currency has to be converted to repay a loan or make an interest payment; or
(c) A currency has to be converted to make a dividend payment, royalty payment, etc.
Note that in each case, the foreign value of the item is fixed; the uncertainty pertains to the home currency value. The important points to be noted are (1) transaction exposures usually have short time horizons and (2) operating cash flows are affected.
11. Translation Exposure
Also called Balance Sheet Exposure, it is the exposure on assets and liabilities appearing in the balance sheet but which is not going to be liquidated in the foreseeable future. Translation risk is the related measure of variability.
The key difference is the transaction and the translation exposure is that the former has impact on cash flows while the later has no direct effect on cash flows. (This is true only if there are no tax effects arising out of translation gains and losses.)
exposure typically arises when a parent multinational company is required to
consolidate a foreign subsidiary’s statements from its functional currency into
the parent’s home currency. Thus suppose an Indian company has a
12. Contingent Exposure
The principle focus is on the items which will have the impact on the cash flows of the firm and whose values are not contractually fixed in foreign currency terms. Contingent exposure has a much shorter time horizon. Typical situation giving rises to such exposures are
a. An export and import deal is being negotiated and quantities and prices are yet not to be finalized. Fluctuations in the exchange rate will probably influence both and then it will be converted into transactions exposure.
b. The firm has submitted a tender bid on an equipment supply contract. If the contract is awarded, transactions exposure will arise.
c. A firm imports a product from abroad and sells it in the domestic market. Supplies from abroad are received continuously but for marketing reasons the firm publishes a home currency price list which holds good for six months while home currency revenues may be more or less certain, costs measured in home currency are exposed to currency fluctuations.
In all the cases currency movements will affect future cash flows.
13. Competitive exposure
Competitive exposure is the most crucial dimensions of the currency exposure. Its time horizon is longer than of transactional exposure – say around three years and the focus is on the future cash flows and hence on long run survival and value of the firm. Consider a firm, which is involved in producing goods for exports and /or imports substitutes. It may also import a part of its raw materials, components etc. a change in exchange rate gives rise to no. of concerns for such a firm, example,
What will be the effect on sales volumes if prices are maintained? If prices are changed? Should prices be changed? For instance a firm exporting to a foreign market might benefit from reducing its foreign currency priced to foreign customers. Following an appreciation of foreign currency, a firm, which produces import substitutes, may contemplate in its domestic currency price to its domestic customers without hurting its sales. A firm supplying inputs to its customers who in turn are exporters will find that the demand for its product is sensitive to exchange rates.
Since a part of inputs are imported material cost will increase following a depreciation of the home currency. Even if all inputs are locally purchased, if their production requires imported inputs the firms material cost will be affected following a change in exchange rate.
Labour cost may also increase if cost of living increases and the wages have to be raised.
Interest cost on working capital may rise if in response to depreciation the authorities resort to monetary tightening.
Exchange rate changes are usually accompanied by if not caused by difference in inflation across countries. Domestic inflation will increase the firm’s material and labour cost quite independently of exchange rate changes. This will affect its competitiveness in all the markets but particularly so in markets where it is competing with firms of other countries
Real exchange rate changes
also alter income distribution across countries. The real appreciation of the
US dollar vis-à-vis deutsche mark implies and increases in real incomes
of US residents and a fall in real incomes of Germans. For an American firm,
which sells both at home, exports to
Thus, the total impact of a real exchange rate change on a firm’s sales, costs and margins depends upon the response of consumers, suppliers, competitors and the government to this macroeconomic shock.
In general, an exchange rate change will effect both future revenues as well as operating costs and hence exchange rates changes, relative inflation rates at home and abroad, extent of competition in the product and input markets, currency composition of the firm’s costs as compared to its competitors’ costs, price elasticities of export and import demand and supply and so forth.
What is currency risk? Enumerate the different types of currency risks with examples.
Ans. Currency risk arises due to exposures explained in concepts 10 to 13
Discuss the exposure and risk occurring due to the changes in
a) Interest rates
b) Exchange rates
a) Interest rate uncertainty exposes a firm to the following kinds of risks:
If the firm has borrowed on a floating rate basis, at very reset date, the rate for the following period would be set in line with the market rate. The firm’s future interest payments are therefore uncertain. An increase in rates will adversely affect the cash flows.
Consider a firm, which wants to undertake a fixed investment project. Suppose it requires foreign currency financing and is forced to borrow on a floating rate basis. Since its cost of capital is uncertain, an additional element of risk is introduced in project appraisal.
On the other hand, consider a firm, which has borrowed on a fixed rate basis to finance a fixed investment project. Subsequently inflation rate in the economy slows down and the market rate of interest declines. The cash flows from the project may decline as a result of the fall in the rate of inflation but the firm is logged into high cost borrowing.
A fund manager expects to receive a sizable inflow of funds in three months to be invested in five –year interest rate will have declined thus reducing the return on his investments.
A bank has invested in a six-month loan at 18% and financed it by means of a three-month deposit at 16.5%. At the end of three months it must refinance its investment. If deposits rates go up in the mean while its margin will be reduced or may even turn negative.
A fund manager is holding a portfolio fixed income securities such as government and corporate bonds. Fluctuations in interest rates expose into two kinds of risks. The first is that the market value of his portfolio varies inversely with interest rates. This is the risk of capital gains or losses. Secondly he receives periodic interest payments on his holdings, which have to be reinvested. The return he can obtain on these reinvestments in uncertain.
In each of these cases, an adverse movement in interest rates hurts the firm by either increasing the cost of borrowing or by reducing the return on investment or producing capital losses on its assets portfolio. During the early 80’s investor’s preferences shifted towards floating rate instruments thus exposing borrowers to substantial interest rate risks.
For most Indian companies the idea of interest rate risk is relatively new. In an environment of administered rates and fragmented, compartmentalized capital markets, neither investors nor borrowers felt the need to worry fluctuations in interest rates.
With increasing resort to external commercial borrowings, Indian companies have had to recognize and learn to manage interest rate risk. Also, the Indian financial system is gradually moving in the direction of market determined interest rate risk. Also, the Indian financial system is gradually moving in the direction of market determined interest rates. During the last few years the environment has changed drastically. In particular, the steep rise in interest rates during 1995-1996 has led to the painful realization that careful management of the interest rate risk is crucial to a firm’s financial health.
Ans. 2. b) Same as descriptive question no. 1
3. Discuss the available tools to manage risk involved due to fluctuations in exchange rates and interest rates.
A firm may be able to reduce or eliminate currency exposure by means of internal and external hedging strategies.
INTERNAL HEDGING STARTEGIES
A firm may be able to shift the entire risk to another party by invoicing its exports in its home currency and insisting that its imports too be invoiced in its home currency, but in the presence of well functioning forwards markets this will not yield any added benefit compared to a forward hedge. At times, it may diminish the firm’s competitive advantage if it refuses to invoice its cross-border sales in the buyer’s currency.
In the following cases invoicing is used as a means of hedging:
Trade between developed countries in manufactured products is generally invoiced in the exporter’s currency.
Trade in primary products and capital assets are generally invoiced in a major vehicle currency such as the US dollar.
Trade between a developed and a less developed country tends to be invoiced in the developed country’s currency.
If a country has a higher and more volatile inflation rate than its trading partners, there is a tendency not to use that country’s currency in trade invoicing.
Another hedging tool in this context is the use of “currency
cocktails” for invoicing. Thus for instance, British importer of fertilizer
Basket invoicing offers the advantage of diversification and can reduce the variance of home currency value of the payable or receivable as long as there is no perfect correlation between the constituent currencies. The risk is reduced but not eliminated. Also, there is no way by which the exposure can be hedged since there is no forward markets I these composite currencies. As a result, this technique has not become very popular.
Netting and Offsetting
A firm with receivables
and payables in diverse currencies can net out its exposure in each currency by
matching receivables with payables. Thus a firm with exports to and imports
To be able to use netting effectively, the company must have continuously updated information on inter-subsidiary payments position as well as payables and receivables to outsiders. One way of ensuring efficient information gathering is to centralise cash management.
Leading and lagging: Another internal way of managing transactions exposure is to shift the timing of exposures by leading or lagging payables and receivables. The general rule is lead, i.e. advance payables and lag, i.e. postpone receivables in “strong” currencies and, conversely, lead receivables and lag payables in weak currencies. Simply shifting the exposure in time is not enough; it has to be combined with a borrowing/lending transaction or a forward transaction to complete the hedge.
Both these tools exist as a response to the existence of market imperfections.
A. Using hedging for forwards market:
In the normal course of business, a firm will have several contractual exposures in various currencies maturing at various dates. The net exposure in a given currency at a given date is simply the difference between the total inflows and the total outflows to be settled on that date. Thus suppose ABC Co. has the following items outstanding:
Item Value Dates to maturity
1.USD receivable 800,000 60
2.NLG payable 2,000,000 90
3.USD interest payable 100,000 180
4.USD payable 200,000 60
5.USD purchased forward 300,000 60
6.USD loan installment due 250,000 60
7.NLG purchased forward 1,000,000 90
Its net exposure in USD at 60 days is:
Whereas it has a net exposure in NLG of –1,000,000 at 90 days.
The use of forward contracts to hedge transactions exposure at a single date is quite straightforward. A contractual net inflow of foreign currency is sold forward and a contractual net outflow is bought forward. This removes all uncertainty regarding the domestic currency value of the receivable or payable. Thus in the above example, to hedge the 60 day USD exposure, ABC Co. can sell forward USD 650,000 while for the NLG exposure it can buy NLG 1,000,000 90 day forward.
What about exposures at different date? One obvious solution is to hedge each exposure separately with a forward sale or purchase contract as the case may be. Thus in the example, the firm can hedge the 60 day USD exposure with a forward sale and the 180 day USD exposure with a forward purchase.
B. Hedging with the money market:
Firms, which have access to international money markets for short-term borrowing as well as investment, can use the money market for hedging transactions exposure.
E.g.: Suppose a German firm ABC has a 90 day Dutch Guilder receivable of NLG 10,000,000. It has access to Euro deposit markets in DEM as well as NLG. To cover this exposure it can execute the following sequence of transactions:
Borrow NLG in the euroNLG market for 90 days.
Convert spot to DEM.
Use DEM in its operations, e.g. to pay off a short-term bank loan or finance inventory.
When the receivable is settled, use it to pay off the NLG loan.
Suppose the rates are as follows:
NLG/DEM Spot: 101025/35 90day forward: 1.1045/65
EuroNLG interest rates: 5 1/4/5 ½
EuroDEM interest rates: 4 3/4/5.00
Comparing the forward cover against the money market cover. With forward cover, each NLG sold will give an inflow of DEM (1/1.064)= DEM 0.9038, 90 days later. The present value of this (at 4.74%) is
0.9038/[1+ (0.0475/4)]= DEM 0.8931
To cover using the money market, for each NLG of receivable, borrow NLG 1/[1+ (0.055/4)]
= NLG 0.9864, sell this spot to get DEM (0.9864/1.1035)
Pay off the NLG loan when the receivables mature. Thus the money markets cover; there is a net gain of DEM 0.0008 per NLG of receivable or DEM 8000 for the 10 million-guilder receivable.
Sometimes the money market hedge may turn out to be the more economical alternative because of some constraints imposed by governments. For instance, domestic firms may not be allowed access to the Euromarket in their home currency or non-residents may not be permitted access to domestic money markets. This will lead to significant differentials between the Euromarket and domestic money market interest rates for the same currency. Since forward premia/ discounts are related to Euromarket interest differentials between two currencies, such an imperfection will present opportunities for cost saving.
E.g. A Danish firm has imported computers worth $ 5 million
DKK/USD Spot: 5.5010/20
180 days forward: 5.4095/ 5.4110
Euro $: 9 1/2/ 9 ¾
Euro DKK: 6 1/4/ 6 ½
Domestic DKK: 5 1/4/ 5 ½
The Danish government has imposed a temporary ban on non-residents borrowing in the domestic money market. For each dollar of payable, forward cover involves an outflow of DKK 5.4110, 180 days from now. Instead for each dollar of payable, the firm can borrow DKK 502525 at 5.5%, acquit $ 0.9547 in the spot market and invest this at 9.50% in a Euro $ deposit to accumulate to one dollar to settle the payable. It will have to repay DKK 5.3969 [=5.2525* 1.0275], 180 days later. This represents a saving of DKK 0.0141 per dollar of payable or DKK 70,500 on the $5 million payable.
From the above example it is clear that from time to time cost saving opportunities may arise either due to some market imperfection or natural market conditions, which an alert treasurer can exploit to make sizeable gains. Having decided to hedge an exposure, all available alternatives foe executing the hedge should be examined.
C. Hedging with Currency Options:
Currency options provide a more flexible means to cover transactions exposure. A contracted foreign currency outflow can be hedged by purchasing a call option (or selling a put option) on the currency while an inflow can be hedged by buying a put option. (Or writing a call option. This is a “covered call” strategy).
Options are particularly useful for hedging uncertain cash flows, i.e. Cash flows those are contingent on other events. Typical situations are:
a. International tenders: Foreign exchange inflows will materialise only if the bid is successful. If execution of the contract also involves purchase of materials, equipments, etc. from third countries, there are contingent foreign currency outflows too.
b. Foreign currency receivables with substantial default risk or political risk, e.g. the host government of a foreign subsidiary might suddenly impose restrictions on dividend repatriation.
Risky portfolio investment:
A funds manager say in
E.g. On June 1, a
DEM/GBP Spot: 2.8175/85
90-day Swap points: 60/55
September calls with a strike of 2.82 (DEM/GBP) are available for a premium of 0.20p per DEM. Evaluating the forward hedge versus purchase of call options both with reference to an open position.
Open position: Suppose the
firm decides to leave the payable unhedged. If at maturity the pound sterling/
DEM spot rate is
ii. Forward hedge: If the firm buys DEM 5,00,000 forward at the offer rate of DEM 2.8130/PS or PS0.3557/ DEM, the value of the payable is PS (5,00,000 * 0.3557)=PS 1,77,850.
iii. A Call option: Instead the firm buys call options on DEM 5,00,000 for a total premium expense of PS 1000.
At maturity, its cash outflow will be
PS [(5,00,000)St +1025] for St<= 0.3546
= PS 178325 for St>=0.3546.
Here it is assumed here that the premium expense is financed by a 90 day borrowing at 10%.
D. Hedging with currency futures:
Hedging contractual foreign currency flows with currency futures is in many respects similar to hedging with forward contracts. A receivable is hedged by selling futures while a payable is hedged by buying futures.
A futures hedge differs from a forward hedge because of the intrinsic features of future contracts. The advantages of futures are, it easier and has greater liquidity. Banks will enter into forward contracts only with corporations (and in rare cases individuals) with the highest credit rating. Second, a futures hedge is much easier to unwind since there is an organized exchange with a large turnover.
A firm may be able to reduce or eliminate interest rate exposure by mean of following hedging strategies.
Forward rate Agreements:
A FRA is an Agreement between two parties in which one of them (The seller of FRA), contracts to lend to other (Buyer), a specified amount of funds, in a specific currency, for a specific period starting at a specified future date, at an interest rate fixed at the time of agreement. A typical FRA quote from a bank might look like this:
USD 6/9 months: 7.20 – 7.30% P.a.
This is to be interpreted as follows.
v The bank is willing to accept a three month USD deposit starting six months from now, maturing nine months from now, at an interest rate of 7.20% P.a. (Bid Rate).
v The bank is willing to lend dollars for three months, starting six months from now at a interest rate of 7.30% P.a. (Ask Rate).
The important thing to note is that there is no exchange of principal amount.
Interest rate futures:
futures are one of the most successful financial innovations in recent years.
The underlying asset is a debt instrument such as a treasury bill, a bond, and
a time deposit in a bank and so on. For e.g. the International Monetary Market
(a part of Chicago Mercantile Exchange) has a futures contract on US government
treasury bills, three-month Eurodollar time deposits and US treasury notes and
bonds. The LIFFE has contracts on Eurodollar deposits, sterling time deposits and
Interest rate futures are used by corporations, banks and financial institutions to hedge interest rate risk. A corporation planning to issue commercial paper for instance can use T-Bill futures to protect itself against an increase in interest rate. A corporate treasurer who expects some surplus cash in near future to be invested in short-term instruments may use the same as insurance against a fall in interest rates. A fixed income fund manager might use bond futures to protect the value of her fund against interest rate fluctuations. Speculators bet on interest rate movements or changes in the term structure in the hope of generating profits.
Interest Rate Swaps:
A standard fixed-to-floating interest rate swap, known in the market jargon as a plain vanilla coupon swap (also referred to as “exchange of borrowings”) is an agreement between two parties in which each contracts to make payments to the other on particular dates in the future till a specified termination date. One party, known as the fixed ratepayer, makes fixed payments all of which are determined at the outset. The other party known as the floating ratepayer will make payments the size of which depends upon the future evolution of a specified interest rate index (such as the 6-month LIBOR). The key feature of this is:
The Notional Principal:
The fixed and floating payments are calculated if they were interest payments on a specified amount borrowed or lent. It is notional because the parties do not exchange this amount at any time; it is only used to compute the sequence of payments. In a standard swap the notional principal remains constant through the life of the swap.
Interest rate Options:
A less conservative hedging device for interest rate exposure is interest rate options. A call option on interest rate gives the holder the right to borrow funds for a specified duration at a specified interest rate, without an obligation to do so. A put option on interest rate gives the holder the right to invest funds for a specified duration at a specified return without an obligation to do so. In both cases, the buyer of the option must pay the seller an up-front premium stated as a fraction of the face value of the contact.
As interest rate cap consists of a series of call options on interest rate or a portfolio of calls. A cap protects the borrower from increase in interest rates at each reset date in a medium-to-long-term floating rate liability. Similarly, an interest rate floor is a series or portfolio of put options on interest rate, which protects a lender against fall in interest rate on rate dates of a floating rate asset. An interest rate collar is a combination of a cap and a floor.
5. Explain the importance and relevance of hedging in foreign exchange market.
Foreign Exchange Market
The foreign exchange market is the market in which currencies are brought and sold against each other. It is the largest market in the world. Foreign exchange market is an over the counter market. This means there is no single market place or an organized market place or an organized exchange (like a stock exchange) where traders meet and exchange currency. The traders sit in the offices (foreign exchange dealing rooms) of major commercial banks around the world and communicate with each other through telephones, telex, computer terminals and other electronic means of communication.
Hedging means a transaction undertaken specifically to offset some exposure arising out of the firm’s usual operations. In other words, a transaction that reduces the price risk of an underlying security or commodity position by making the appropriate offsetting derivative transaction.
Different types of exposures
Refer to concept questions 10 to 13.
Hence after looking at the different types of exposures, traders faces it is very clear that Hedging with the help of derivatives will ensure a safe transaction in Foreign exchange market.
6. Is it possible to hedge the foreign exchange risk in the forwards market?
Ans. It is not possible to hedge forex risk fully.
This is so because as long as there exists currency as a medium of exchange the person holding the currency is exposed to different types of risks e.g. political, financial, …
This can be explained with the help of example of an Indian
exporter. If he has contracted for exports worth 1000 USD and the spot rate was
45 Rs./$ for a period of 6months with a co. in
In above case, if we hedge our position the cash flow would be certain, but still we have Rs. i.e. a currency in our hand with which risk prevails.
Here comes in the political risk i.e. even when the Indian exporter has the home currency. In case the country’s economy crashes the currency will loose all it value throughout the world.
Thus, with the help of above e.g. it can be proved that as long as currency is involved we have risk.
7. Explain with an example how to cover exchange risk in the forwards market.
Ans. Please refer to answer 3 (A)
8. What factors determine the value of an option?
Ans. The factors are
a. Maturity of an option: higher the price higher the value of an option and vice a versa
b. Spot price of underlying assets:
c. Strike price of underlying assets:
d. Interest rate structure in the market: higher the interest rate structure in the market higher the value of an option and vice a versa
e. Volatility: higher the volatility in the market higher the value of an option and vice a versa. This is so because higher the volatility in the market, higher the potential for earning more, thus the buyer of an option has to pay more premium.
9. Explain with examples how options are used to cover exchange risks?
Ans. Currency options provide corporate treasurer another tool for hedging foreign exchange risks arising out of firms operations. Unlike forward contract, options allow the hedger to gain from favorable exchange rate movements, while been unprotected from unfavorable movements. However forward contracts are costless while options involve up front premium cost.
a) Hedging a Foreign Currency with calls.
In late February an American importer anticipates a yen payment of JYP 100 million to a Japanese supplier sometime late in May. The current USD/JYP spot is 0.007739 (which implies a JYP/USD rate of 129.22.). A June yen call option on the PHLX, with strike price of $0.0078 per yen is available for a premium of 0.0108 cents per yen or $0.000108 per yen. Each yen contract is for JPY 6.25 million. Premium per contract is therefore: $(0.000108 * 6250000) = $675.
The firm decides to purchase 16 calls for a premium of $10800 .In addition there is a brokerage fee of $20 per contract. Thus the total expense in buying the option is $11,120.The firm has in effect ensured that its buying rate for yen will not exceed $0.0078+ $(11120/100,000,000)= $0.0078112 per yen.
The price the firm will actually end up paying for yen depends on the spot rate at the time of payment .For further clarification the following 2 e.g. are considered:
Yen depreciates to $0.0075 per yen (Yen / $ 133.33) in late May when the payment becomes due .The firm will not exercise its options. It can sell 16 calls in the market provided the resale value exceeds the brokerage commission it will have to pay. (The June calls will still have some positive premium) .It buys yen in the spot market .In this case the price per yen it will have paid is $0.0075 + $0.0000112 - $
If the resale value of the options is less than $320, it will simply let the options lapse .In this case the effective rate will be $0.0075112 per yen or yen 133.13 per $. It would have been better to leave the payable uncovered. The forward purchase at $0.0078 would have fixed the rate at that value and would be worse than the option.
Yen appreciates to $0.08
Now the firm can exercise the options and procure the yen at the strike price of $0.0078.In addition, there will be transaction cost associated with the exercise. Alternatively, it can sell the option and buy the yen in the spot market. Assume that June yen calls are trading at $0.00023per yen in late May. With the latter alternative, the dollar will be $800000- $(0.00023 * 16* 6250000)+ $320= $777320. Including the premium, the effective rate the firm has paid is $(0.0077732+0.0000112) = $0.0077844.
b) Hedging a receivable with a put option
A German chemical firm has supplied goods worth Pound 26 million to a British customer. The payment is due in two months. The current DEM/GBP spot rate is 2.8356 and two month forward rate is 2.8050. An American put option on sterling with 3 month maturity and strike price of DEM 2.8050 is available in the inter bank market with a premium of DEM 0.03 per sterling. The firm purchases a put option on pound 26 million .The premium paid is DEM (0.03 * 26000000) = DEM 780000. There are no other costs.
Effectively the firm has put a floor on the value of its receivable at approximately DEM 2.7750 per sterling (= 2.8050-0.03). Again two e.g. are considered:
The pound sterling depreciates to DEM 2.7550 .The firm exercises its put option and delivers pound 26 million to the bank at the price of 2.8050. The effective rate is 2.7750. It would have been better off with a forward contract.
10. Write a short note on currency swaps
Ans. Please refer to concept answer 8
11. What types of exchange exposure in a multinational enterprise subject to?
Ans. Please refer to descriptive answer 1
Adauga cod HTML in site